Austin Field Sobriety Test Attorneys
Challenging Field Sobriety Test Results in Travis County
Were you pulled over on suspicion of driving while intoxicated? Did you “fail” a field sobriety test? This does not necessarily mean that you should be found guilty of DWI. In fact, field sobriety tests are not considered 100% accurate or reliable when it comes to determining whether someone is driving under the influence. Even when they are administered correctly, which is not always the case, the results are highly subjective.
At Smith & Vinson Law Firm, we help people charged with DWI based on field sobriety tests challenge the results of these tests and other evidence. Our Austin field sobriety test attorneys can investigate and evaluate your unique case to determine how to best defend your interests. We are here to seek the truth and fight for your constitutional rights.
Contact our experienced DWI attorneys today at (512) 359-3743 for a free, confidential consultation.
What Is a Field Sobriety Test?
A field sobriety test is a series of physical and cognitive exercises conducted by law enforcement officers to assess a driver's level of impairment due to alcohol or drugs. These tests are used during a traffic stop if the officer suspects that the driver might be intoxicated or under the influence of an intoxicating substance.
Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are closely linked to DWI arrests and charges. Typically, an officer will use field sobriety tests to establish probable cause of intoxication and provide grounds for a DWI arrest. An officer’s testimony regarding field sobriety testing may also be used to support the prosecuting attorney’s case that a driver’s abilities were impaired.
Types of Field Sobriety Tests
There are three standardized field sobriety tests, or SFSTs, used by Austin police officers after stopping drivers suspected of DWI.
These include:
- Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test: The officer checks for involuntary jerking of the eyes as the driver follows a moving object, like a pen, with their eyes.
- Walk-and-Turn Test: The driver is asked to walk in a straight line, heel-to-toe, turn around, and walk back.
- One-Leg Stand Test: The driver is asked to stand on one leg for a certain period of time, usually around 30 seconds, while counting aloud.
These tests are used to test balance, coordination, and a driver’s ability to follow instructions. They are graded based on set standards to determine whether a driver is intoxicated. These tests are not foolproof, however, and may be administered improperly.
Common Problems with Field Sobriety Tests
It is widely known that field sobriety tests are not perfect measures of intoxciation, and the results of these tests are not 100% reliable.
In fact, there are several major problems with field sobriety tests, including:
- Law enforcement officers often do not administer or grade these tests correctly. Some officers even use tests that are not sanctioned by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
- Certain health conditions can make you more likely to fail a field sobriety test. If you are anxious or sleep-deprived while taking the test, you may be less likely to pass. You could fail the test if you had knee or back pain, or if you have a medical condition that affects your coordination.
- Certain types of clothing could make you fail a field sobriety test. For example, you could be more likely to fail the walk-and-turn test, where you put one foot in front of the other and walk in a straight line, if you were barefoot or wearing high heels.
These are only a few examples of why taking a field sobriety test could put you at a disadvantage. Even adverse weather conditions could increase the chances of failure. Because of this, it’s important that you challenge the results of a failed FST, and our Austin field sobriety test lawyers can help.
Field Sobriety Tests vs. Chemical Tests
When it comes to evaluating impairment during a traffic stop, field sobriety tests and chemical tests are two distinct methods used by law enforcement. Understanding the differences between them is crucial, especially if you find yourself navigating a DUI or DWI charge.
The key differences include:
- Field Sobriety Tests: FSTs are a series of physical and cognitive exercises administered on the roadside. These tests are designed to gauge a person's balance, coordination, and overall ability to perform tasks. These tests are subjective; their accuracy can be influenced by various factors, such as the test-taker’s physical condition, their nervousness, or even weather or road conditions. An officer's interpretation of the results can vary, which introduces an element of variability and potential for error.
- Chemical Tests: Chemical tests measure the actual concentration of alcohol or drugs in a person’s system. These tests can be administered through breath, blood, or urine samples. Breathalyzer tests are commonly used at the roadside, while blood tests are typically conducted at a medical facility. Chemical tests provide a more objective measure of impairment, as they directly quantify the level of substances in the body. However, they are not infallible and can be affected by factors such as the calibration of the testing equipment or improper sample handling.
Simply put, field sobriety tests assess physical and cognitive function through observable tasks, while chemical tests measure the actual presence of substances in the body. If you're facing charges related to these tests, it's essential to understand these differences and consult with a knowledgeable attorney to ensure your rights are protected.
How to Challenge Field Sobriety Test Results in Central Texas
Not only is it possible to challenge the results of a field sobriety test, but it is also wise to do so. These tests are highly subjective, and the results are often inaccurate. However, if you do not challenge the results, you will almost certainly be charged with DWI, which can lead to a wide range of criminal and administrative penalties.
The best way to challenge a FST is to contact an experienced DWI attorney, like ours at Smith & Vinson Law Firm. An attorney from our firm can look for inaccuracies, mistakes, and other issues that call the results of the test into question.
In challenging field sobriety test results, our Austin field sobriety test attorneys often ask key questions such as:
- Was the testing area well-lit, or was it dark?
- Was the ground uneven?
- Was the defendant wearing high-heeled shoes or other clothing that affected their ability to perform the requested actions?
- Did the officer give clear instructions, or were the instructions confusing?
- Did the officer properly evaluate the defendant’s performance?
- Does the defendant have a physical condition that would impact their ability to perform the tests?
- Was the officer properly trained in administering field sobriety tests?
- Did the officer give a test sanctioned by the NHTSA?
Once we have thoroughly examined the circumstances surrounding the test, we can begin to build a case aimed at challenging this evidence. Our team works quickly to minimize the impact of a DWI arrest on your life. We are ready to fight for you; get in touch with us today to learn how.
Call our office at (512) 359-3743 or submit a secure contact form today to get started with a free and confidential case evaluation.
Field Sobriety Test FAQ
Do I have to take a field sobriety test in Texas?
In Texas, you are allowed to decline a field sobriety test. However, due to the state’s implied consent laws, you could face consequences for doing so. The officer may arrest you and require you to submit to a breathalyzer, blood, or urine test. You could also face automatic driver’s license suspension for refusing a FST, even if you are not convicted of DWI.
What if I already took and failed a field sobriety test?
If you took and failed a field sobriety test, you should reach out to a knowledgeable DWI defense attorney right away. An attorney can determine whether the test was supported by probable cause or administered correctly. Your attorney could also uncover other factors that may have affected the test’s accuracy and use this to fight for reduced or dismissed charges.
Should I hire a lawyer after failing a field sobriety test?
Working with an attorney after failing a field sobriety test offers several significant advantages. DWI attorneys are knowledgeable in defending clients against these types of charges and are well-versed in the intricacies of field sobriety tests. They possess a deep understanding of the standardized procedures required for these tests and can skillfully challenge their validity in court.
How can a field sobriety test attorney at Smith & Vinson Law Firm help me?
Our lawyers work to identify errors or inconsistencies in the administration of field sobriety tests, such as improper instructions, faulty equipment, or external factors that could have influenced test performance. By leveraging this knowledge, our Austin field sobriety test attorneys can build a robust defense strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of your case, potentially leading to reduced charges or even case dismissal.
What’s more, a field sobriety test lawyer from our firm can navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding your Texas DWI case. We are familiar with state laws, procedures, and precedents related to DWI and DUI offenses, allowing us to mount comprehensive defenses for our clients. Our attorneys can explore alternative explanations for test results, challenge the prosecution's evidence, and negotiate with prosecutors to secure favorable plea deals if and when appropriate.
Our Client Reviews
Earning Our Reputation by Protecting Yours
-
Smith and Vinson are absolutely incredible! They go above and beyond to help their clients and have a track record of success in getting cases dismissed. Their aggressive approach and unwavering dedication make them stand out from the rest.- Linda W.
-
What sets this firm apart is their unwavering dedication to their clients. They listen attentively, provide clear guidance, and approach every case with the utmost diligence. Their attention to detail is truly impressive, and they leave no stone unturned.- Former Client
-
When in battle you need people by your side who are fierce enough to face the opposition with you. Brad and Jarod far exceeded my expectations with their passion for winning and attention to detail.- Nikki C.
-
After the Jury was selected, the first witness was called to the stand, and Brad and Jarrod imploded the State's case. Moments later, the case was dismissed. I couldn't be any more thankful for Smith & Vinson.- Former Client
A Proven Track Record
Check Out Our Recent Case Results
-
Not Guilty 2nd DWI
911 caller reported a major rollover, single car accident. EMS and fire arrived on scene. They had to break the window to get our client out of the car. He said he had swerved to miss a deer and had been up close to 18 hours before the crash. Police later arrived on scene, spoke to our client and he admitted to coming from a bar and drinking 2 martinis.
-
Not Guilty 2nd DWI
Our client was pulled over for a traffic violation. Officer smelled alcohol, client admitted to consuming a few drinks. Officer also noted slurred speech and bloodshot eyes. Client performed the SFST’s (roadside tests). Officer said he failed all 3, eye test, walk and turn and one-leg stand. Officer placed client under arrest and asked him for a sample of breath and/or blood. Client refused. Officer did not get a blood warrant.
-
Case Dismissed 2nd DWI
Our client was involved in a vehicle accident in La Grange where she was ejected from the vehicle and had to stay in the hospital. There was alcohol in the car, and she had prior DWIs. The ethanol levels in her blood came back at a .13 so she was charged with Driving While Intoxicated. This client was unaware that she was charged after she left the hospital which resulted in the charge of Bail Jumping. However she maintained that she had only an 8% functioning liver due and upon researching her medical hist
-
Deferred Adjudication Aggravated Assault & Tampering with Evidence
Our client was involved in a verbal dispute that turned into an altercation where a firearm was discharged into the ground. The round ricocheted and grazed a party to the dispute. Our client was facing multiple felony convictions and a prison sentence.
-
Deferred Adjudication Aggravated Assault Family Violence w/ Serious Bodily Injury
Our client was involved in a domestic altercation that resulted in one of the parties sustaining a very serious life -altering injury that required serious medical intervention. We took the case and approached our defense with heavy strong willed negotiations with the State.
-
Rejected Pre-Indictment Aggravated Assault Strangulation/Impeding Airway Investigation